Uppalapati Brenda v. The Regional Manager State Bank of India,
WP/16524/2021 · 2025-01-28
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19339 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19339 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010270892021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16524/2021 Between: Uppalapati Brenda ...PETITIONER AND The Regional Manager State Bank Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NO.16524 OF 2021 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Madhava Rao, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 28.01.2025 BSP
142
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.16524 of 2021
28.01.2025 BSP