HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 426 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition was filed seeking direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the objections filed by the petitioner under the EIA Notification, 2006 before deciding the application filed by respondent No. 3. 2. Submissions have been made that though the application made by respondent No. 3 has been decided, objections filed by the petitioner have not been considered. 3. Once the application has been decided by competent authority, the petitioner has to take appropriate proceedings qua the said order, in accordance with law. 4. Insofar as the present petition is concerned, the same has been rendered infructuous. 5. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. October 13, 2025 Mukesh Pal/RK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parth Goswami, Pramod Kumar Singh, Yogesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Ramanand Pandey (A.C.S.C.), Krishna Agarawal (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad