IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16384 of 2024 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brij Bala …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioner has filed a representation dated 12.04.2024 (Annexure P-6) for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition, but till date the same has not been adjudicated upon; Petitioner would be 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the representation in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 12.04.2024 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 10, 2025 Judge Mukesh