Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193370 (ALL)

SMT. VARSHA GOYAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

TACR/472/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 472 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, learned counsel for the applicant and Imran Khan, learned AGA for the State-respondent are present. 2. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to transfer the further proceeding of complaint case No. 7455 of 2025, u/s 12 of Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, P.S. Shahganj, District Agra, pending in the Court of Civil Judge, (Junior Division)/Fast Track Court, Agra to any other judgeship/court of competent jurisdiction at Amroha. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is daughter in law of the opposite party no. 2 and she filed the instant transfer application to transfer the case relates to Domestic Violence Act which was filed by opposite party no. 2 from District Agra to District Amroha but applicant is ready to appear through video conferencing and therefore, the instant application may be disposed off with the direction that if applicant filed an application before appropriate forum to appear through video conferencing then his application shall be entertained and he will be permitted to appear through video conferencing. 4. Learned AGA is having no objection. 5. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant is daughter in law of the opposite party no. 2 and she filed the instant transfer application to transfer the case relates to Domestic Violence Act from District Agra to District Amroha but now she is ready to pursue the matter through video conferencing, therefore, instant transfer application is being disposed off with a direction that if applicant filed an application to pursue through video conferencing then her application shall be considered and she will be permitted to pursue the matter through video conferencing. October 14, 2025 Ankita Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ishwar Chandra Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Smt. Varsha Goyal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad