HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4646 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1.The contemner is present in person before the Court, who has been identified by the learned Standing Counsel. 2. Respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit of compliance, which is taken on record. 3. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 4. Learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents states that the order passed by the writ court has been complied with. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the compliance of the order dated 13.5.2025; however, contended that the applicant has suffered some financial loss because of late decision taken by the opposite party. 6. In my opinion, the applicant can raise his grievance before the appropriate forum. 7. In this conspectus, as above, the instant contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 8. Presence of opposite party no.2 is exempted. October 13, 2025/P.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yogesh Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Commitee Of Management Vimla Devi Brijmohan Singh Inter College .....Applicant(s) Sri Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, Regional Joint Director Of Education And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad