Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193329 (ALL)

VASEEM v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22750/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22750 of 2025 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant writ petition investigation has already been completed and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. 3. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. October 14, 2025 SA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Pandey, Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vaseem .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad