1 2025:CGHC:34273 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 856 of 2018 1 - Khilu Ram S/o Samaru Ram Aged About 47 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Mahud (B), Thana Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Kunj Bai W/o Khilu Ram Aged About 40 Years Caste Gond, R/o Village Mahud (B), Thana Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Bhineshwari D/o Khilu Ram Aged About 15 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Khilu Ram S/o Samaru Ram, Aged About 47 Years, Caste Gond, R/o Village Mahud (B), Thana Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Manish Kumar S/o Khilu Ram Aged About 12 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Khilu Ram S/o Samaru Ram, Aged About 47 Years, Caste Gond, R/o Village Mahud (B), Thana Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 versus 1 - Ved Ram @ Vijay Sonwani S/o Bahur Das Sonwani Aged About 29 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Haldi, Thana Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Vehicle Ajax Mixer No. C.G.07 C.A. 5891), District : Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Pammi Sharma S/o Deep Chand Sharma R/o Near Tripti Restaurant Padmanabhpur Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Vehicle Ajax Mixer No. C.G.07 C.A. 5891), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Tata A.I.G. General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Branch Office Shop No. 126 Ground Floor Dhillan Complex Supela Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Vehicle Ajax Mixer No. C.G.07 C.A. 5891), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : None. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 18/07/2025 1. None appears for the appellant to argue the case, even in the second round, neither any representation was made to seek any adjournment. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this case. 2. In absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this 3 Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant MAC for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant MAC is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat