HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33228 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not issuing the No Objection Certificate for establishment of new Retail Outlet of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent no. 4-Executive Engineer, (Prantiya Khand), Public Works Department, Baghpat within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 13, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Ojha, Shiv Poojan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Sharvan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad