Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1933 (CAL)

DILIP KUMAR GANGULI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/28834/2025 · 2026-01-06

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1133.. ((D DLL)) 0066..0011..22002266 Ct. No. 02 (Suvendu) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 28834 OF 2025 DILIP KUMAR GANGULI VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS Mr. Asim Kr. Chakraborti, Adv. Mr. Bibek Tripathy, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. N.C. Bihani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, Adv. …for C.S.T.C. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Petitioner was an employee of Calcutta State Transport Corporation, who retired on superannuation on 31st October, 2024. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner was under contributory provident fund scheme and after retirement 20 per cent of provident fund due was paid to the petitioner. Gratuity was also paid to the petitioner not on the date of retirement but subsequently. Petitioner has made two-fold prayer; payment of 80 per cent unpaid provident fund dues and interest on gratuity and 80% Provident Fund. 2 4. Calcutta State Transport Corporation is represented by learned advocate. 5. Having considered the case made out in this writ petition, Court finds it apt to direct the concerned authority of Calcutta State Transport Corporation to pay 80 per cent unpaid provident fund dues to the petitioner by six (6) weeks from the date of communication of this order. 6. Since it is found that Calcutta State Transport Corporation caused delay in releasing provident fund and gratuity, said authority is directed to pay interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum on gratuity and 80% provident fund dues from the date following the date of retirement till the date of payment of those amounts within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order. 7. In the event concerned respondent authority fails to pay unpaid provident fund dues and interest on gratuity and 80% provident fund in terms of the aforesaid directions within the stipulated time, respondent authority shall be required to pay 8 per cent interest per annum on deferred payment. 8. With the aforesaid directions writ petition stands disposed of. 3 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)