Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193288 (ALL)

SMT. SAVITRI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35676/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35676 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Kannauj to decide the application of issuing a character certificate to the petitioner for purposes of Thekedari License in pursuance of her applications dated 02.08.2021. (2) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. (3) Award costs of this petition to the petitioner." 3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Kannauj to consider her grievances but the respondent No.2 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, Ujjawal Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Savitri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Kannauj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same to consider and decide the same in view of the guidelines laid down by this Court in bunch of writ petitions leading of which is Writ-C No.718 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others) within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 13, 2025 SS WRIC No. 35676 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad