HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4252 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhinav Krishna, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. At the outset, Sri Sanjay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the disputed demand has been rectified and at present, the respondent Nagar Nigam is claiming Rs. 14,113/- against the original disputed demand Rs. 42,444/-. 3. The petitioner acknowledges the correctness of the revised demand. He undertakes to pay the same. 4. In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is consigned to record in view of the statement made. October 13, 2025 Abhilash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Shri Krishna Dutt .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHILASH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad