BAJRANG BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/29246/2025 · 2025-10-08
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29246 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Heard Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Dileep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for private respondents no. 7 and 8 and Sri Pradeep Kumar Shahi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has complained violation of temporary injunction order dated 6.3.2025 granted to him in civil suit no. 8 of 2025.
3. In our considered view, if petitioner is aggrieved by any violation of the temporary injunction order, he should first approach that very Court for ensuring that the order of temporary injunction is complied with by moving an appropriate miscellaneous application under Order 39 Rule 2A of Code of Civil Procedure.
4. In the circumstances, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter at this stage. We still provide that in the event petitioner moves any such miscellaneous application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure complaining violation of temporary injunction order, the trial court will put the defendants to notice and decide the same in accordance with law.
5. With aforesaid observations and directions, petition stands disposed of. October 9, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dileep Kumar Srivastava (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Bajrang Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad