[2025:RJ-JP:26057] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7754/2025 Ranjana Chaturvedi D/o Ghanshyam Chaturvedi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Talfara, Kumher, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Headquarter, Bharatpur. 4. The Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sever, District Bharatpur. 5. The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Tuhiya, Sevar, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/07/2025 1. Earlier when the matter came up on Board before this Court on 12.05.2025, following order was passed: “1. The grievance of petitioner is that she has been given appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-I under the PH category on the basis of medical certificate for physically handicapped (Annexure 2), issued by the District Medical Board, Madhya Pradesh, but thereafter, on an anonymous complaint of submitting a forged medical certificate, again she has been called for re-medical examination to verify her medical certificate. 2. As per the order dated 30.01.2025, issued by the District Education Officer Headquarter (Primary Education), Bharatpur, the re-medical examination of the petitioner was to be conducted on the same day. [2025:RJ-JP:26057] (2 of 2) [CW-7754/2025] 3. Counsel for petitioner is not able to show that in pursuance of such order, the re-medical examination of petitioner has been conducted or not. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is adjourned for four weeks, as prayed.“ 2. Counsel for petitioner has produced one additional affidavit of petitioner along with a letter dated 04.02.2025, issued by the CMHO, Bharatpur, pointing out that in the Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, facility of “Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Visual Evoked Potential (VEP)” is not available, hence, petitioner was referred to SMS Hospital Jaipur, for such medical check-ups. 3. Counsel for petitioner, having instructions of petitioner, admits that in furtherance thereof, medical re-examination of petitioner at SMS Hospital, Jaipur, has been conducted on 28.05.2025. Hence, in such view of matter, as far as the prayer made in this regard, in present writ petition, is concerned, same has rendered infructuous. However, in case, on the basis of report, passed after re-medical examination of petitioner from SMS Hospital, Jaipur, any adverse order(s) is passed against the petitioner, petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh writ petition, assailing such order. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, instant writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/10