AWADHESH CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS), U.P. AT LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/14011/2025 · 2025-10-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193203 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193203 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14011 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the First Information Report dated 25.11.2024 registered as Case Crime No. 520 of 2024, under Sections 376, 504, 506, 120B IPC, Police Station Rudrapur, District Deoria.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Brijesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant and perused the material available on record.
3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State informs the Court that the investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has also been filed against the accused persons on
22.07.2025. In support of his contention, he has drawn the attention of the Court to the averments made in paragraph no. 7 of the short counter affidavit, filed on behalf of the State.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava, Nagendra Bahadur Singh Awadhesh Chauhan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, (Ministry Of Home Affairs), U.P. At Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed and a charge-sheet has also been filed, we do not find any good reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail such other remedy available to him under the law, as advised. October 10, 2025 RPD CRLP No. 14011 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad