Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1932 (HP)

Vipan Kumar v. Pooja Dadwal AND ANR

CRMPM/2277/2025 · 2026-03-24

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vipan Kumar versus Pooja Dadwal & Another Cr. MP(M) No.2277 of 2025 24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Annanya Verma, Advocate, for the respondents. Cr.MP(M) No.2277 of 2025 After taking into consideration the pleadings and submissions made by learned counsel for parties, delay of 21 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No.______ of 2026 [Cr.Rev(FC)ST No.8677 of 2025] Be registered. Notice. Ms. Annanya Verma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents and seeks time to have complete instructions. Records be requisitioned. Name of Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, be also reflected along with Annanya Verma, Advocate, as counsel for respondents, in future. List for consideration on 21.05.2026. Cr.MP No._______ of 2026 [CRMPST No.8678 of 2025] Notice in aforesaid terms. Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within three weeks thereafter. List for consideration along with main petition on the next date. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) March 24, 2026 Judge [Shivender]