DHARMVEER v. MEDHA ROOPAM, COLLECTOR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/4694/2025 · 2025-10-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193192 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193192 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4694 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Opposite party has filed compliance affidavit in the Court, which is taken on record.
2. Learned Standing Counsel representing the opposite party states that representation moved by the present applicant has been decided in compliance of the order dated 24.5.2024 passed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has tried to challenge the illegality and correctness of the order passed by the opposite party. In my opinion, he has alternative remedy to challenge the order passed by the opposite party, in case, he is aggrieved with the said order.
4. In this conspectus, the instant contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. October 13, 2025 P.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Dharmveer .....Applicant(s) Medha Roopam, Collector / District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad