HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12667 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " (1) to direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahar Jaunpur to decide the stay application (Paper No.6 C) in Civil suit No. 1282 of 2022 (Sunil Kumar and another Versus Gram Panchayat Ranjeetpur and another) before him on merits within a specific period which to be fixed by this Hon'ble court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Shahar Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lakshmi Kant Pandey, Sandeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sunil Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) Gram Panchayat Ranjeetpur And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad