Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 193168 (ALL)

ABDUL MAZID v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE) AND 49 OTHERS

WRIC/36326/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36326 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Abhishek Pandey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ramendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Rajan Chauhan, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel representing the respondent-Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No. 2, the Commissioner/Additional Commissioner, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, to decide Revision No. 28 of 2009 (New Case No. 1913 of 2024) (Computerized No. C202402000001913), [Ram Sevak Singh and Others Vs. Kayum & Others], under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, within a stipulated time period. The petitioner asserts himself to be one of the respondents in the pending revision. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition, to point out that although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the matter is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, by way of the present petition has sought for proceedings to be concluded expeditiously. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kant Pandey, Radhey Shyam Tripathi, Ramendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Abdul Mazid .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Additional Principal Secretary (Revenue) And 49 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and the counsel for the respondent Gram Sabha have no objection if the proceedings are expedited. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 36326 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad