HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 5321 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Akriti Chaturvedi, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ravi Anand Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 & 4 and learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 30.05.2024 passed by respondent no.4 by which his claim for providing subsidy for infrastructure of electric vehicle charging station on the ground that there is a Government Order in this regard. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order impugned has been passed without application of mind, inasmuch as there is a Government Order issued by the Union of India on 14th January, 2022 in this regard and, therefore, the impugned order can not be sustained in view of law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner as the decision is to be taken by the respondent no.4. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a detailed representation against the order dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Pratap Singh, Indrajeet Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C., Krishna Agarawal, Prem Narayan Rai M/S Sulaxmi Traders .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 30.05.2024 enclosing therewith all the materials which establishes that the petitioner is entitled to the subsidy for establishment of electric vehicle charging station alongwith certified copy of this order before the respondent no.4-Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand-6 (EDD-6), Bulandshahr of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam at Bulandshahr, within a period of four weeks from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. October 10, 2025 Virendra WRIC No. 5321 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad