Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19313 (RAJ)

SURESH CHAND SHARMA S/O SHRI RADHEY SHYAM @ MAULA v. ALOK PRESENTLY POSTED AS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CMAP/254/2024 · 2025-01-03

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 254/2024 in S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1695/2018 Suresh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Radhey Shyam @ Maula, ----Petitioner Versus Alok Presently Posted As The Principal Secretary, ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 03/01/2025 This civil misc. application has been filed by the petitioner- applicant (for short ‘the applicant’) for revival of the S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1695/2018. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the petitioner filed S.B. Civil Contempt Petition alleging non-compliance of the order dated 30.04.2018 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11371/2017. He further submits that against the said order dated 30.04.2018, a D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 780/2018 was filed, in which interim order dated 03.10.2018 was passed. In this view of the matter, contempt petition was disposed with liberty to the petitioner to move an application for revival of the contempt petition. Accordingly, after disposal of the special appeal, the petitioner filed a Civil Misc. Application No. 12/2020 for revival of the contempt petition but the same was dismissed as withdrawn (2 of 2) [CMAP-254/2024] vide order dated 20.09.2023 on the ground of interim order having been passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, with liberty to the applicant to get it revived if the need so arises. He further submits that the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 06.05.2024 dismissed the appeal filed by the respondents and affirmed the order passed by this Court. Thus, in this view of the liberty granted, he has filed the present civil misc. Application for revival of the contempt petition. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the relevant material on record. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the liberty granted to the applicant, the application is allowed and the contempt petition is revived to its original number. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to supply an additional copy of the application in the office Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG. List after six weeks after showing the name of Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG in the cause list. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/48