APHC010269532020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. Bulle Lakshmidevamma,, W/o Bulle Ramudu, Aged about 72 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o No.6-356, Kottalapalli Vilage, B.K.Samudram Mandal, Ananthapuram District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Pr Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District. 3. The Station House Officer, Bukkarayasamudram, police station, Ananthapur District. 4. Smt B Lingeswaramma, W/o B. Gangadhar, Aged 37 years, R/o Kotalapalli village,B.K.Samudram Mandal, Ananthapur District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to please to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the and Respondent Police personnel in pressurizing and forcing the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17772 OF 2020 1. Bulle Lakshmidevamma,, W/o Bulle Ramudu, Aged about 72 years, Occ 356, Kottalapalli Vilage, B.K.Samudram Mandal, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Prl. Secretary (Home), Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District. 3. The Station House Officer, Bukkarayasamudram, police station, 4. Smt B Lingeswaramma, W/o B. Gangadhar, Aged 37 years, R/o Kotalapalli village,B.K.Samudram Mandal, Ananthapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be please to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the and Respondent Police personnel in pressurizing and forcing the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Bulle Lakshmidevamma,, W/o Bulle Ramudu, Aged about 72 years, Occ 356, Kottalapalli Vilage, B.K.Samudram Mandal, ...Petitioner l. Secretary (Home), 3. The Station House Officer, Bukkarayasamudram, police station, 4. Smt B Lingeswaramma, W/o B. Gangadhar, Aged 37 years, R/o No. 6/386, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be please to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the and Respondent Police personnel in pressurizing and forcing the petitioner and her Family Members to execute Regd. Sale Deed in favour of 4th Respondent without any legal cause as illegal, arbitrary and also violation of the Articles 21, 300(A) of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent Police not to pressurize the Petitioner and her Family Members to execute Regd. Sale Deed in favour of 4th Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Police not to pressurize the Petitioner and her Family Members to execute Regd. Sale Deed in favour of 4th Respondent in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17772 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…please to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the and Respondent Police personnel in pressurizing and forcing the petitioner and her Family Members to execute Regd. Sale Deed in favour of 4th Respondent without any legal cause as illegal, arbitrary and also violation of the Articles 21, 300(A) of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent Police not to pressurize the Petitioner and her Family Members to execute Regd. Sale Deed in favour of 4th Respondent and...” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that police are not threatening the petitioner for execution of registered sale deed in favor of the 4th respondent as alleged by the petitioner. 4. Recording the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stands closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025. KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17772 OF 2020 03.09.2025 KKV