Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1931 (AP)

SALN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24870/2025 · 2026-05-04

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010488162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24870/2025 Between: 1. SALN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI D SREENATH VELLORE HIGHWAY, PALLURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH HIGHER EDUCATION REGULATORY AND MONITORING COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS MEMBER-SECRETARY 3RD FLOOR, SREE MAHENDRA ENCLAVE, NRI BLOCK (C-BLOCK). NH-16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the 2 High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent, in not notifying the tuition fee as recommended by the 2nd Respondent, Regulatory Commission through E File no. 2955336 for MCA (Master of Computer Applications) and E File No. 2955348 for BBA (Bachelor of Business Administration) and BCA (and Bachelor of Computer Applications) and thereby disabling the Petitioner institution to participate in the ongoing admissions Counselling, as being arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to determine and notify the fee structure for the Petitioner institution and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 1st Respondent to notify the tuition fee towards the Petitioner institution as recommended by the 2nd Respondent vide E File no. 2955336 for MCA (Master of Computer Applications) and E File No. 2955348 for BBA (Bachelor of Business Administration) & BCA (and “Bachelor of Computer Applications) to the Petitioner-Institution for the block period 2025-26 to 2026-27, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. VIVEKANANDA VIRUPAKSHA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.24870 of 2025 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition. 2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed. 3. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 05.05.2026 chs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 137 WRIT PETITION No.24870 of 2025 Date: 05.05.2026 chs