Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19309 (JHR)

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THR ITS LEGAL MANAGER MR DIPANKAR ROY v. Puspa Devi And Ors

MA/523/2015 · 2025-02-07

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 523 of 2015 ----- ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office at P.P. Tower, 2nd Floor, Bistupur, PO & PS- Bistupur, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) having its office at Zenity House, Keshavrao, Khadey Marge, Opposite Race Course, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-400034, through its Legal Manager Mr. Dipankar Roy, son of Dilip Kumar Roy, resident of Ashirwad Mansion, Main Road, PO & PS Chutia, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) …Opposite Party/ Appellant Versus 1. Pushpa Devi, w/o late Suresh Chandra Mahato, 2. Anuradha Mahato, D/o late Suresh Chandra Mahato 3. Usha Mahato (Minor), daughter of late Suresh Chandra Mahato 4. Kishan Kumar Mahato (Minor), son of late Suresh Chandra Mahato 5. Khani Kumar Mahato (Minor), son of late Suresh Chandra Mahato Respondent Nos. 3,4 and 5 are minors and represented through their mother respondent no.1 as legal guardian; All residents of village Palashdih, PO: Sini, Dist. Seraikella- Kharsawan (Jharkhand) at present residing at Sankosai, Road No.4, Dimna Road, Mango, PO & Ps Mango, town- Jamshedpur, District: East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) … Claimants/Respondent(s) 6 Kisto Murmu, S/o Sri Samsar Murmu, R/o Adityapur Old Saldih Bastim Near ESIC Hospital back side, PO: Adityapur, District Seraikella- Kharsawan (Jharkhand).. Opposite Party No.1/Respondent ----- CORAM :SRI GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J. ------ For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. A.K. Lall, Advocate …...... 14 /07.02.2025: The learned counsel for the appellant submits that, as per instruction, the insurance company does not want to proceed with the appeal and, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the same. 2. Prayer is accorded. 3. The present Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The statutory amount deposited by the appellant, at the time of filing of the appeal, is permitted to be withdrawn. (GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) KNR/Abha