HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4440 of 2018 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ravi Dubey, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Ram Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 161 of 2017 arising out of Case Crime No.202 of 2017 under Sections 323, 506, 376 I.P.C. and also relating to final report no. 186 of 2015, P.S. Ekdil, District Etawah (Geeta Devi vs. Jeetu & others) pending in the Court of A.C.J.M. Court No.5, Etawah, so far it relates to the present applicants with further prayer to stay the further proceeding in the aforementioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that in compliance of the order dated 30.05.2025 passed by this Court the applicants filed compromise deed before the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 5, Etawah, and the concerned court vide its order dated 13.08.2025 verified the said compromise in the presence of the applicants and opposite party no.2, copy of which is annexed as Annexure- SA-2 to the supplementary-affidavit dated 10.09.2025 filed by the applicants. He further submitted that applicant no.1 and O.P. No.2 are living together as husband and wife since 2013 with other family members and from the wedlock of husband and wife a male child namely Sanskar was born in the year 2013 and in this regard both the parties have given a joint affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akash Mishra, Pramod Kumar, Ram Ashish Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jeetu Singh @ Jeetu Babu And 7 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted that since the parties have entered into compromise, which has also been verified by the trial court, therefore, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, is also present. He has no objection to the statements, made above. 6. In view of the above, it is deemed proper and meet the ends of justice that the proceeding of the aforementioned case be quashed. 7. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed, keeping in view the compromise made by the applicants as well as opposite party no.2. The entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 161 of 2017 arising out of Case Crime No.202 of 2017 under Sections 323, 506, 376 I.P.C. and also relating to final report no. 186 of 2015, P.S. Ekdil, District Etawah (Geeta Devi vs. Jeetu & others) pending in the Court of A.C.J.M. Court No.5, Etawah, is hereby quashed, so far as it relates to the applicants herein. October 16, 2025 KK Patel A482 No. 4440 of 2018 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad