Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19305 (AP)

Pothuri Subbaiah, v. Yadam Balaji,

CRP/1342/2025 · 2025-09-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010269652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1342/2025 Between: 1. POTHURI SUBBAIAH, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HINDU, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.19-7-25, OPP- VENKATESWARASWAMI TEMPLE, SRINIVASANAGAR, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. YADAM BALAJI, S/o.Chinna Rosaiah, Aged about 40 years, Hindu, Occ- Business, R/o.Perala, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the Revision Petition is being preferred aggrieved by the order and decree dated 26.03.2025 passed in E.P.No.314 of 2019 in O.S.No.49 of 2015 on the file of the court of Learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.314 of 2019 in O.S.No.49 of 2015 on the file of the court of Learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1342 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the revision petition does not survive and it has become infructuous, hence, prayed to dismiss the revision petition. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.09.2025 SPP 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO C.R.P.No. 1342 OF 2025 Date: 04.09.2025 SPP