MEERA OMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/30957/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193047 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193047 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30957 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayers:-
"I. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent bank to refund the money to the petitioners with 9% interest as directed by the learned Debt. Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad vide its order dated 23.9.2022 (Annexure No.2) forthwith."
2. Sri Krishna Mohan Asthana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank has placed before the Court the status and argued that against the aforesaid order, the Bank preferred an appeal before the Debt. Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad which was numbered as Case No.Dy- 1075/2022 in which the next date of hearing is fixed as 4.11.2025. It is further argued that in the aforesaid case the petitioners are also impleaded as one of the respondents.
3. After going through the aforesaid, prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioners to dismiss the present petition as not pressed.
4. As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. October 14, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Krishna Mohan Asthana, C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Meera Omar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad