Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19304 (GAU)

BUBUL BORO AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/6457/2018 · 2025-03-20

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010207412018 2025:GAU-AS:3078 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6457/2018 BUBUL BORO AND 2 ORS. S/O. LATE LOMU RAM BORO, VILL- BOGAPANI, P.O. JAMUGURI, P.S. THALAMARA, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784149 2: SEBAN BASUMATARY C/O. KHUDI RAM BASUMATARY VILLAGE- SIPRIA BATABARI P.O. TELIGAON P.S. THALAMARA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784149. 3: KUMAR MALHARI C/O. LATE PANI RAM MALHARI VILLAGE- CHENGAHILOY P.O. SILIKHABARI P.S. THALAMARA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784149 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, THE DEPTT. OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANJABARI, GUWAHATI. DIST. KAMRUP(M), 781037 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 DIST. KAMRUP(M) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM. 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SONITPUR P.O. P.S.- TEZPUR ASSAM DIST. SONITPUR PIN- 784001. 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SONITPUR ZILA PARISHAD P.O. AND P.S. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784001. 5:THE PRESIDENT BIHAGURI PARISHAD P.O. BIHAGURI P.S. THALAMARA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784153. 6:THE PRESIDNET BIHAGURI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT P.O. BIHAGURI P.S. THALAMARA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784153 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P HAZARIKA, MR. D KONWAR,MR. A RAJKHOWA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. T C CHUTIA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 21.03.2025 None appears for the writ petitioners. Ms. U. Sarma, learned Govt. Page No.# 3/3 Advocate, Assam is present for the respondent no.3. This writ petition pertains to the orders of settlement issued in terms of NIT dated 14.05.2018 for settlement of Markets/Ghat/Minmohal for the year 2018-19 under the Bihguri Anchalik Panchayat. Considering the period of settlement involved and the date of the NIT, it is apparent that the writ petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant