HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26509 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. The applicant was directed to file a supplementary affidavit by means of the order dated 08.09.2025. The order dated 08.09.2025 is being quoted hereinbelow:- "1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant in Court today, is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file supplementary affidavit annexing the typed and photostat copy of the relevant documents likewise civil proceeding with another document. 3. Put up this case as fresh on 07.10.2025." 2. Today, when the case has been called out, Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he proposes not to file any supplementary affidavit in view of the prayer being made, which is of a direction for expeditious consideration of bail. 3. In view of this prayer being made by the Learned counsel for the applicant, three weeks' time is granted to the applicant to appear before the concerned Court and apply for bail, which shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with law. 4. With these observations, the application is disposed off. October 28, 2025 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Shiromani Yadav, Satya Deo Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Molaee .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad