1 2025:CGHC:20115 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3072 of 2025 1 - Dameshwar Singh Deshmukh S/o Rajkumar Deshmukh Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Daily Wages Employee (Driver), Public Health Department (E/m), Sub-Division- Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Jhabbu Kujur S/o Dohan Kujur Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Daily Wages Employee (Driver), Public Health Department (E/m), Sub-Division- Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 3 - Ramdhani Lakra S/o Mangal Ram Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Daily Wages Employee (Helper), Public Health Department (E/m), Sub-Division- Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.05.03 17:26:20 +0530 2 2 - The Engineer-In-Chief Public Health Engineering Department, Tehsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering Department, Tehsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - The Superintendent Engineer Public Health Engineering Department, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) 5 - The Executive Engineer (E/m) Public Health Engineering Department, Sub-Division- Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Aman Upadhyay, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 02.05.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are working as Daily Wagers in Public Health Department (E/m) Sub-Division- Jashpur District Jashpur preferred the present writ petition seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to consider their case for regularization pursuance to the circular dated 05.03.2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are working 2001, 2013 and 2001 respectively in the respondent department and the petitioners have submitted a representation 3 before the Executive Engineer/respondent no. 5 on 12.04.2025 and he submits that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondent for consideration of their claim of regularization in accordance with law under the current policy of the State Government. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent have no objection to the prayer made by the petitioner. 4. I have heard both the parties. 5. In view of the submission made by the petitioner and the respondents. As the petitioner has submitted a representation before the Executive Engineer vide (Annexure P/2) on 12.04.2025, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Engineer respondent no. 5 to consider the grievance and claim of the petitioner in accordance with law and the policy of regularization currently existing in the State. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib