Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12945-DB RP No. 126 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REVIEW PETITION NO. 126 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1.
BASWARAJ NALEGAVE, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE-1, C.R. BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
D.P. NAGENDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL TAX, C.R. BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
3.
M. HIMABINDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, THE JOINT SECRETARY ADMIN, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
4.
M. AJIT KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
Digitally signed by PRAJWAL A Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12945-DB RP No. 126 of 2023
5.
AJAY BHUSHAN PANDEY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VAIBHAV RAVI MALIMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
R. PRABHU, S/O SHRI M. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O NO.15, 2ND CROSS, FLOWER GARDEN, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU-560 018. …RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF C.P.C, PRAYING TO GRANT THE REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 15/11/2022 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13429/2022, (ANNEXURE A) AND HUMBLY REVIEW AND DELETE THE STATEMENT AT PARAGRAPH NO. 4 OF THE SAID ORDER BEING
“WE FIND IT STRANGE THAT THOUGH THE TRIBUNAL HAS RECORDED THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAVE ADOPTED A STAND TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER, YET THE TRIBUNAL DEEMED FIT TO REJECT THE APPLICATION”, ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12945-DB RP No. 126 of 2023
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under:
“The counsel for the Petitioners humbly seeks leave to withdraw the present matter in the interests of justice and equity.”
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs if any, stands disposed of.
Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8