HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23689 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Learned A.G.A. submits that the F.I.R. discloses the prima facie offence against the petitioners in as much as they had assaulted the public servant on duty. There is video evidence to establish the case against the petitioners. Hence, no interference is warranted. Faced with this, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not wish to press the relief for quashment of the F.I.R. in the writ petition. The relief sought in the writ petition is accordingly rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners recast his relief and submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and other legal remedies available with them. It is always open to the petitioner to avail their legal remedy to protect their liberty under the law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. October 17, 2025 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Santosh Kumar Srivastava And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad