HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29001 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant, today in the Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Devottam Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anand Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 110 of 2025, under Sections 109, 351(3), 352, 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Bansdeeh Road, District Ballia. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is not named in the FIR. Subsequently, his name came up in the statement of injured, who made general allegation against the applicant and co-accused Santosh @ Babloo Verma. It is further submitted that co-accused Santosh @ Babloo Verma has already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28041 of 2025 vide order dated 28.08.2025. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Criminal history of only one case has been shown against the applicant, which is explained in supplementary affidavit and applicant is on bail in that case. The charge- sheet has been filed in this case against the applicant and no custodial interrogation is required. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 6. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devottam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Imran Ansari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant- Imran Ansari involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) October 13, 2025 Vibha Singh BAIL No. 29001 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad