RAJENDRA PANDEY AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/26584/2025 · 2025-10-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192994 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192994 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 26584 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of Bailable Warrant dated 15.7.2025, summoning order dated 13.10.2022 under sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 294, 354, 427, 325 & 34 IPC in Crl. Case no. 4006 of 2002 arising out of cognizance taken upon charge sheet dated 1.2.2022 submitted in Case Crime no. 267 of 2021 under sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 294, 354, 427, 325 and Section 34 of IPC, PS- Jahanaganj, District Azamgarh. 3. On perusal of the entire material available on record in shape of impugned order along with other record, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shivam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajendra Pandey And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply for bail, if there is no other legal impediment before learned court concerned, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants namely Rajendra Pandey, Devendra Pandey, Sandeep Pandey, Ashish Pandey, Ratandeep Pandey and Amit Pandey in pursuance of aforesaid case.
October 28, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 26584 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad