2025:HHC:9931 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 132 of 2023 Decided on: 09.04.2025 ______________________________________________________________ Yog Raj and others ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. _______________________________________________________________ Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioners : Mr. Naresh Kaul and Ms. Sheetal Kaul, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Mr. Sushant Keprate, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is under instructions not to press this petition, as the petitioners (herein) intend to file individual petitions. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:9931 2. Learned Additional Advocate General states that recoveries from some of the petitioners are required to be effected and therefore, the petitioners be not permitted to withdraw this petition. However, we find no merit in this contention. 3. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file individual petitions. However, in case, the respondents are entitled to recover any amount from any of the petitioners, they may do so, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) 09th April, 2025 Judge (Sumit) 2