Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19297 (GAU)

GOKUL HALDAR v. PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA AND ANR

I.A.(Civil)/3526/2024 · 2025-08-12

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010208622024 2025:GAU-AS:10672 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3526/2024 GOKUL HALDAR S/O LATE GOURHARI HALDAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALIBARI WARD NO. 2 PO GAURIPUR, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA AND ANR S/O GOBINDA RAM AGARWALA, 18/1 GOABAGAN STREET, PO BEADON STREET, PS BURTALLA, KOLKATA MUNICIPAL WEST BENGAL 2:RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. PRAG PLAZA 5TH FLOOR 100 GS ROAD BHANGAGARH PO GUWAHATI 781005 DIST KAMRUP M ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R AGARWALA, MR ADITYA AGARWALA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A J SAIKIA (R-2), Linked Case : GOKUL HALDAR VERSUS Page No.# 2/2 PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA AND ANR (F) ------------ Advocate for : MR. A R AGARWALA Advocate for : appearing for PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA AND ANR (F) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 13/08/2025 Heard learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, Mr. A.R Agarwala and also learned counsel for the respondent No. 2/ Insurer, Mr. A.J Saikia. The present application under Section 5 of the limitation Act has been filed praying for condonation of delay of 119 days in preferring the connected MACApp against the Judgment and Order dated 29.02.2024 passed by the learned MACT Dhubri in MAC Case No. 106/2019. The applicant has been able to show sufficient cause for the delay. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 has also not objected to the same, and prays that the matter may be heard on merits. Accordingly, the delay of 119 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. The Registry shall register the connected MAC App and list the same for admission on 27.08.2025, reflecting the name of learned counsel, Mr. A.J Saikia as counsel for the respondent No. 2/Insurer. JUDGE Comparing Assistant