VINAY SINGH ALIAS VINAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6701/2025 · 2025-08-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19296 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19296 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:22685] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6701 of 2025
------ Vinay Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh, aged about 31 years, son of Gulab Singh, resident of Village Dulsulma, P.O. Satbarwa, P.S.- Medninagar, Dist.-Palamau
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl P.P
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-08-08-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Garu P.S. Case No.39 of 2017 arising out of G.R. Case no.848 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 386, 387 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, being an active member of extremist organization, armed with deadly weapon demanded extortion. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that petitioner has been named in the F.I.R, on the basis of his name taken by the co-accused persons, during the alleged occurrence. It is then submitted that petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-20 of the bail application. It is further submitted that petitioner has been in jail custody since 05.03.2025 as has been mentioned in para-17 of the Bail Application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.08.2019 in B.A. No.5067 of 2019. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Latehar in connection with Garu P.S. Case No.39 of 2017 arising out of G.R. Case no.848 of 2017 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/