Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192955 (ALL)

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35016/2025 · 2025-10-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35016 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Mohd. Mustafa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Sadar, District Gorakhpur (respondent no.2) to decide the application/objection of the petitioner dated 1.3.2023 in Case No.RST/1454/2011-12, Computerized Case No.T201105310300065 (Chandrakanti Vs. Rajbhuta) under Section 34 of the U P Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously and within a stipulated time period. A copy of the order-sheet of the case is brought on record, which indicates that the proceedings are pending since quite some time and, that although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the matter has not been disposed of. As per the provisions contained in the U P Revenue Code, 2006, the proceedings under Section 34 of the U P Land Revenue Act, 1901 are summary in nature and are to be concluded within a time bound period. Having regard to the facts of the case and in particular, since the proceedings are pending for quite some time, it is appropriate to issue a direction to respondent no.2 to make an endeavor to decide the proceedings, preferably within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment, and the application/objection of the petitioner, which is stated to have been filed in the aforesaid proceedings would be considered and disposed of when the case is finally decided. Present petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 7, 2025 RKK/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Mustafa Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Ranjan Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad