AMRENDRA PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL-IST PRAYAGRAJ DIVISION PRAYAGRAJ AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/36349/2025 · 2025-10-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192950 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192950 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36349 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Aprajit Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel appearing for the Gram Sabha. Present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No.1-Additioinal Commissioner (Judicial) 1st, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, to decide Case No.0249 of 2020 (Computerized Case No.C202002000000249) [Jai Pratap Singh @ Bablu Singh vs. Surendra Pal Singh and others), a revision filed against an order under Section 35 of the U P Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously and within a stipulated time period. Petitioner has stated himself to be one of the respondents in the revision. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition to point out that although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, matter has been adjourned. The delay in disposal of the case is stated to be causing hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to respondent No.1, to conclude the proceedings at an early date. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that respondent No.1-Additioinal Commissioner (Judicial) 1st, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, would make an endeavor to conclude the proceedings of the case, which is stated to be pending before it, preferably within a period of three months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 RKK/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aprajit Yadav, Shyam Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Amrendra Pal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Judicial-Ist Prayagraj Division Prayagraj And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad