k APHC010268762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) K£ THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12212 OF 2019 Between: Pacha Sundaraiah, S/o. Late. Pullaiah, aged about 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. State Bank Colony, A.K.Nagar, Post office Road, Nellore City, S.P.S.R Neliore District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principle Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Superintendent of Police, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. 3. The Station House Officer, Vedayapalem, P.S, Near Ayyapaswami Temple, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. 4. Jorepalli Chalapathi, S/o. Venkata Narasaiah, aged about 45, R/o. East Street, Venkatagiri Town, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ. Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3'^'^ respondent in repeatedly sending police constables to petitioner's house and asking to come to police % station to sit from morning to evening and insisting to settled the civil dispute with 4*'" respondent as per his demand and threatening in false criminal cases for failure thereof, their being any authority of law and constitution of India and petitioner to the poiice station and not to insist petitioner to sit in poiice station from morning to evening without there being manner with personai life of petitioner and liberty in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 to implicate petitioner as illegal, irregular, irrational, without offends articles 14 19 and 21 of consequently direct the 3^'^ respondent not to call the any authority nor interfere in any Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3^^ respondent not to call the praying that in the circumstances stated petitioner to the poiice station and insist the petitioner to sit in police station from morning to evening before their authority and not to interfere in any manner with personal life of petitioner and liberty, pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 ; GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010268762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION NO: 12212/2019 PRATAPA Between: 1 PACHA SUNDARAIAH,, S/0 LATE. PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/0. STATE BANK COLONY A K NAGAR POST OFFICE ROAD, NELLORE CITY, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT.’ ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. NELLORE CITY. S.P S R NELLORE DISTRICT, ■ 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VEDAYAPALEM AYYAPASWAMI TEMPLE, NELLORE CITY DISTRICT. Cf^ALAPATHI, S/0. VENKATA NARASAIAH AGED NELLORE D,s™cr®" VENKATAGIR, TOWN, S.P.S.R, < P.s, NEAR S.P.S.R. NELLORE D , ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ^ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd respondent in repeatedly sending police constables to petitioner's house and asking to come to police ^ morning to evenign and insisting to settled the civil dispute with 4th resporident as per his demand and threatening to implicate petitioner n false criminal cases for failure thereof, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without heir being any authority of law and offends articles 14 19 and 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the 3th respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to insist petitioner to sit in police station om morning to evening without there being any authority nor interfere in any mamer with personal life of petitioener and liberty in the interest of justice and L^NO: 1 OF 2019 2 in thP^^S" Tn i" the circumstances stated hH ! 5 ,.1 ' '" ""hpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3th respondent not to call the pelitioener to the police station and theif m tP P't '0 police station from morning to evening before l^nd lihPrt°' '' "“"a 'oterfere in any manner with personal life of petitioner and liberty . pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of Justce Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent{S)- 1.CiP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: direction more particularly one in the nature f WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd indent in repeatedly sending police constables to petitioners house and asking to come to police station to sit from morning to evenign and insisting to settled the with 4th respondent civil dispute . per his demand and threatening to irnphcate petitioner in false criminal cases for failure thereof as Illegal irregular irrational without their being any authority of law and offends articles 14 19 and 21 of constitution of India and conseguently direct the 3th respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to insist petitioner to sit in police station from morning to evening without there being any authority nor interfere in any manner with personal life of petitioner and liberty in the interest ofjustice. ” Today, when the matter as 2. up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. came 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASI^g^CHARI ASSISTANT^GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Muchakayala Narayana, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CD Copies Pradesh [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED; 17/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 12212 OF 2019 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS