Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19291 (CHH)

BALA RAM JAIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2824/2025 · 2025-04-25

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:18767 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2792 of 2025 1 - Daraswati Bhuarya D/o Shri Harishchandra Bhuarya Aged About 33 Years R/o 15 Bargaon, Hatkondal, P.O. Hatkondal, North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, S 1-13, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Land Records, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chairman High Level Investigation Committee, Chhattisgarh State Government, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Commissioner Land Record, Chhattisgarh, First Floor Block-2, Atal Nagar, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Secretary Ministry Of Home Affairs And Jail, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.26 11:00:35 +0530 2 with WPS No. 2824 of 2025 1 - Bala Ram Jain S/o Shri Vishnu Ram Jain Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 15, Gurunank Ward, Nagar Panchayat Charama, North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, S 1-13, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Land Records, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Chairman, High Level Investigation Committee, Chhattisgarh State Government, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Commissioner Land Record, Chhattisgarh, First Floor Block- 2, Atal Nagar, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Secretary Ministry Of Home Affairs And Jail, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, GA (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 3 25/04/2025 1. Since identical issues involved in the above mentioned writ petitions, they are being heard and decided by this common order. 2. By the present Writ Petitions, the Petitioners are questioning the inquiry report dated 29/11/2024 (Annexure-P/1), wherein, respondent No.4, on the basis of some complaints, initiated an inquiry in respect of departmental examination of the Revenue Inspector conducted in the year 2024 and submitted the same to the Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management/respondent No.1, 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners who are candidates to the said examination is apprehending that on the basis of the said inquiry report which has been prepared behind the back of the petitioners, some action may be taken against them and if any action is taken against them, they will be prejudiced. Therefore, respondent authorities may be directed that if any action is taken on the basis of the said inquiry report dated 29/11/2024 then the respondent shall proceed by giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State would submit that if any action will be taken on the basis of inquiry report against any candidate, then principles of natural justice must be observed and followed. 4 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 6. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the State/respondent, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of with a observation that if the respondent authorities are inclined to take any action on the basis of the inquiry report (Annexure-P/1) which is under challenge in these writ petitions, principles of natural justice be observed and sufficient opportunity of hearing be given to the petitioners before proceeding against them. 7. With the aforesaid observation, all these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE S. Bhilwar