HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36796 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Alok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 5. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to take action on the complaint of the petitioner filed against the Gram Pradhan for alleged financial irregularity. 3. The applications filed by the petitioner annexed as Annexures-4 and 5 to the writ petition are not in accordance with Rule 3 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997, as such, no direction can be issued for making any enquiry. 4. The writ petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application as required under the Enquiry Rules, 1997. October 29, 2025 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh, Phool Chandra Singh, Sumitra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Jatashankar Prasad Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad