Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192887 (ALL)

ANKIT TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/9619/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9619 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the First Information Report dated 28.04.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 322 of 2025, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 34 and 120B IPC, Police Station Auraiya, District Auraiya. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vinay Kumar Singh, learned State Law Officer appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. 3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State informs the Court that the investigation has been completed, charge-sheet has also been filed against the accused persons on 23.06.2025 as Charge Sheet No. 337 of 2025 and cognizance has already been taken by the concerned court. In support of his contention, he has drawn the attention of the Court to the averments made in paragraph no. 4 of the short counter affidavit, filed on behalf of the State. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioners to avail other remedy available to them under the law. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed, charge-sheet has also been filed and cognizance has already been taken by the concerned Court, we do not find any good reason to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajrshi Gupta, Sudhanshu Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ankit Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) keep this matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail such other remedy available to them under the law, as advised. October 13, 2025 Arti CRLP No. 9619 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad