Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35685 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Lal Behari Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shridhar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No. 2, the Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Ghosi, District Mau, to decide the Case No. 4455 of 2025, Computerized Case No. T202515510204455, [Pramila Devi Vs. Deepak and Others], under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition, to point out that although several dates have been fixed, but for some reason or the other, the matter is being adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, by way of the present petition has sought for proceedings to be concluded expeditiously. Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and the counsel for the respondent Gram Sabha have no objection if the proceedings are expedited. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months, without granting any Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lal Behari Yadav, Priyanka Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pramila Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 13, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 35685 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad