HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6373 of 2024 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. No one is present on behalf of the revisionists to press this revision, even in the revised call. However, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. 2. Heard learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has submitted that this Court in Criminal Revision No. 6354 of 2024 has passed an order, wherein the said revision filed by one Ashok Jain has become infructuous, for the reason, that the charges against the revisionist have already been framed. He further submitted that, the charge in respect of the present revisionist, i.e. Ashok Jain has also been framed along with other co- accused persons, if that is so, the present revision has also become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 13, 2025 Faridul Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Amit Daga, Vipul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pandey Balkrishna (Harvir Singh,J.) Vishal Jain And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad