Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192843 (ALL)

DEVARSH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/3929/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3929 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. After arguing the matter at some length, Shri Shailendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition as full fact disclosure with regard to the activities of the principle borrower and the purpsoe for which loan has been advanced to him, have remained to be disclosed in this petition. 2. Shri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for bank has no objection. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 4. Whenever fresh petition is filed notice of the same be served on Shri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the Bank, first. October 13, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Mishra, Shailendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramesh Kumar Shukla, C.S.C., Sushant (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Devarsh Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad