- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22018 WP No. 6958 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6958 OF 2022 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI N KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O D K NARASEGOWDA R/AT DADIGATAMADAGU VILLAGE SASULA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560091. 2. SRI D N UMESHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O D K NARASEGOWDA R/AT DADIGATAMADAGU VILLAGE SASULA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560091. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MURTHY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22018 WP No. 6958 of 2022 2. THE TAHSILDAR DODDABALLAPUR BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS AT ANNEXURE-M DATED 02.06.2020 AND ANNEXURE-N DATED 05.02.2022 FOR ISSUANCE OF SAGUAVALI CHIT AND FOR CHANGE OF KATHA IN THE NAMES OF PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.29 MEASURING 2 ACRES 36 OF DADIGATTAMADAGU VILLAGE SASULA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK AS PER THE GRANT AT ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 02.06.2020 and 05.02.2022 as per Annexures-M and N, whereby petitioners have prayed for issuance of saguvali chit - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22018 WP No. 6958 of 2022 and for change of khata in the names of the petitioners in respect of the subject land. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful examination of the representations at Annexures-'M and N' would indicate that the land in question has been granted in favour of mother of the petitioners and in this regard, it is stated that saguvali chit has not been issued by the respondent - authorities. 4. In that view of the matter, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation at Annexure- M and N, in accordance with law and pass appropriate order, within outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that no opinion is expressed by this Court on merits of the case. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending I.A., if any, does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac