Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192834 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/34467/2025 · 2025-10-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34467 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. Heard Sri Saurabh Raj Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned panel counsel for the respondent-Bank. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus to the respondent no. 4 to freeze the bank account of his parents for the reason that a succession suit is pending in the trial court amongst the heirs of late Surendra Kumar Jaiswal and late Shakuntala Jaiswal. 3. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned panel counsel states that as per his instructions, the savings bank account no. 1913520981 standing in the joint name of late Surendra Kumar Jaiswal and late Shakuntala Jaiswal has already been freezed and the amount deposited in the savings bank account along with other fixed deposit receipts, locker standing in the joint name of the deceased account holders shall be released only in favour of those persons who produce their succession certificate. He submits that in the event parties produce their succession certificate, they will be permitted to have access to the savings bank account, lockers and also the FDRs. 4. In view of the undertaking given before the Court, no further mandamus is required to be issued to the Bank. 5. With these observations and directions, petition stands disposed of. October 10, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Raj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Amit Kumar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad