Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192821 (ALL)

SUSHIL KUMAR GAUTAM v. SRI PAWAN KUMAR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

CAPL/6109/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6109 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the order of this Court has been complied with; therefore, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 29, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shreesh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Sushil Kumar Gautam .....Applicant(s) Sri Pawan Kumar, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad