Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19282 (JHR)

DEVENDRA RAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/627/2024 · 2025-09-12

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27913 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 627 of 2024 ---------- Devendra Rai, son of Kishore Narain Ray, resident of village- Sewadhab, P.O. Kisutand, P.S. Tishri, District Giridih, Jharkhand. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sh. Naman Priyesh Lakra, Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 3. Sh. Vinay Kumar, District Superintendent of Education, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 4. Sh. Ranjeet Choudhary, the Prakhand Shiksha Samiti through Block Education Extension Officer, Tisri, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 5. The Secretary, Gram Siksha Samiti Sewadhab, Giridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. ………. Opp. Parties. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kumar Binay, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Shivam Singh, AC to SC-II ---------- 06/ 12.09.2025 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same, however, he seeks liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if so advised. 3. In view of fair submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant contempt application stands disposed of with liberty as prayed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-