Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19282 (GAU)

M/S RANJIT KAUSHIK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/5141/2024 · 2025-07-17

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010208382024 2025:GAU-AS:9304 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5141/2024 M/S RANJIT KAUSHIK HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HOUSE NO. 10, PINAKI PATH, ZOO TINIALI, GUWAHATI-03, REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR, SRI RANJIT KAUSHIK, SON OF LATE DHIREN SABHAPANDIT, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 10, PINAKI PATH, ZOO TINIALI, GUWAHATI-03, P.O.- ZOO ROAD, P.S.- CHANDMARI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(METRO), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS R.K. MISSION ROAD P.O.- ULUBARI DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN- 781007. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METROPOLITAN DISTRICT HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-36 Advocate for the petitioner(s) : A Choudhury Advocate for the respondent(s) : Mr S R Baruah Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 18.07.2025 Mr A Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that as the petitioner’s grievances have been addressed, nothing further remains in the instant proceedings. 2. Mr S R Baruah, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondents. 3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant